Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Türkiye’de Halkla İlişkiler Lisansüstü Eğitiminde Öğrenci – Öğretim Üyesi İlişkisinin Değerlendirilmesi

Year 2018, Volume: 5 Issue: 4, 465 - 477, 30.07.2018
https://doi.org/10.17680/erciyesiletisim.420523

Abstract

Bu çalışmada öğretim üyeleri ve halkla ilişkiler alanında lisansüstü eğitim alan
öğrenciler arasında kurulan ilişkinin öğrenci bakış açısıyla ele alınarak çözümlenmesi
ve bu ilişkinin iyileştirilmesi adına durum analizi yapılması amaçlanmıştır. Halkla
ilişkiler bölümünde ders veren öğretim üyeleri öğrencilerine; sektöre ve iş hayatına
ilişkin uzman reçeteler sunmak, kurulan iletişimi kolaylaştırmak, problemlere
yenilikçi çözümler geliştirmek ve nihai olarak birer iletişim teknisyeni olarak halkla
ilişkilerin tüm süreçlerine hakim birer uygulamacı olmalarına yardımcı olacak bilgi
ve becerileri sağlamakla yükümlüdür. Bu sorumluluk ise ancak öğrenci ile verimli
bir ilişki kurulmasıyla mümkün olabilmektedir. Bu bağlamda ülkemizde halkla
ilişkiler alanında eğitim alan lisansüstü öğrencilerin ders aldıkları öğretim üyeleriyle
kurdukları ilişkilerin mevcut durumu öğrencilerin görüşleri üzerinden incelenmiş ve
söz konusu ilişki sürecinin geliştirilebilmesi adına önerilerde bulunulmuştur. Nitel
araştırma yönteminin kullanıldığı çalışmada bulguların elde edilmesi amacıyla yarıyapılandırılmış
görüşmeler yapılmıştır. Görüşmeler sırasında katılımcı öğrencilere
öğretim üyeleriyle kurdukları ilişkiye daie sorular yöneltilmiştir.

References

  • Anık, C. (2007). Eğiticinin Performansını Niteleyen Faktörler. Bilig Dergisi, 43, 163- 168.
  • Broom, G. M., and Smith, G. D. (1979). Testing the practitioner’s impact on clients. Public Relations Review, 5(3), 47-59.
  • Broom, G. M. (1980). A Comparison of Roles Played by Men and Women in Public Relations.
  • Broom, G. M., and Dozier, D. M. (1986). Advancement For Public Relations Role Models. Public Relations Review, 12(1), 37-56
  • Chepchieng M.C. (2004). Influence of Institutional Characteristics on Student Attitudes Toward Campus Environment. A Comparative Study of Public and Private Universities in Kenya. Unpublished Ph.D Thesis, Egerton University, Njoro.
  • Christiansen, J. R. (2002). Student/Teacher Relationships and School Success: Perceptions ff Students From Grades Nine To Twelve. Doctoral Dissertation, Lethbridge, Alta: University ff Lethbridge, Faculty Of Education.
  • Fouts, G., and Poulsen, J. (2001). Attunement in the classroom: emotional connection may be the key to student stress. ATA Magazine, 81(3), 14-15.
  • Grunig, J. E., and Hunt, T. T. (1984). Managing Public Relations CL. California: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  • Hill, Y., Lomas, L., and MacGregor, J. (2003). Students’ Perceptions ff Quality In Higher Education. Quality Assurance In Education, 11(1), 15-20.
  • Işık, M. (2012). Halkla İlişkilere Giriş. M. Işık (Edt.). Halkla İlişkiler Uzmanı ve Nitelikleri (p. 22-28). Konya: Eğitim Yayınevi.
  • Karaca, M. (2017). Stratejik Girişimcilerin Kişilik Özelliklerini Belirlemeye Yönelik Bir Araştırma Neo FFI Kişilik Envanteri Uygulaması. Örgütsel Davranış Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(2), 1–19.
  • Ngara, E. (1995). The African University and Its Mission for Improving the Delivery of Education Institutions. Roma: Institute of Southern African Studies.
  • Niebuhr, K. and Neibuhr, R. (1999). An Empirical Study Of Student Relationships And Academic Achievement. Education, 119, (4), 679.
  • Piekos, J. M. and Einsiedel, E. F. (1989). Gender and Decision-making among Canadian Public Relations Practitoners, Paper Meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, (August, 10-13, 1989), 1-25.
  • Ronning W.M. (1997). College Quality Programmes: Implementation and Effects. J. of Quality in Higher Edu., 3(2), 113-129.
  • Soncu A. G. (2017). “İletişim Performansı Bağlamında Lider” Medya Çağında İletişim, Çizgi Kitabevi, Konya, 75-89.
  • Tiberius, R. (1999). The Why Of Teacher Student Relationships. TIP-IT Online Newsletter.
  • Toth, E. L.; Serini, S. A.; Wright, D.K. and Emig, A. G. (1998). Trends in Public Relations Roles: 1990-1995, Public Relations Review, 24(2), 145-163.
  • University of California Sample Teacher Interview Questions, http://eds-courses. ucsd.edu//tep129/InterviewQuestions.htm (Retrieved: 01.03.2018).
  • Whitt, E. J., Edison, M. I., Pascarella, E. T., Terenzini, P. T., and Nora, A. (2001). Influences On Students’ Openness to Diversity and Challenge In The Second And Third Years of College. The Journal of Higher Education, 72(2), 172-204.
  • Williams, D. (1986). Naturalistic evaluation. New directions for program evaluation: No. 30. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Assessment of Student – Lecturer Relationship in Public Relations Postgraduate Education in Turkey

Year 2018, Volume: 5 Issue: 4, 465 - 477, 30.07.2018
https://doi.org/10.17680/erciyesiletisim.420523

Abstract

In this study, it is aimed to analyse the relationship established between lecturers
and students who receive postgraduate education in public relations with student
perspective and to analyse case studies in order to improve this relationship. The
lecturers of the public relations department are obliged to provide their students
with expert prescriptions for the sector and business life, facilitate established
communication, develop innovative solutions to problems and finally provide them
with the knowledge and skills to help them become a practitioner of all processes
of public relations as a communication technician. This responsibility can only be
achieved by establishing an efficient relationship with the student. In this context,
the current situation of the relations of the postgraduate students with the lecturers
who have taken courses in public relations in our country has been examined and
suggestions have been made in order to improve the relationship process. In research
qualitative semi-structured interview method was used to collect data. During the
interviews questions asked to students about their relationship with lecturers.

References

  • Anık, C. (2007). Eğiticinin Performansını Niteleyen Faktörler. Bilig Dergisi, 43, 163- 168.
  • Broom, G. M., and Smith, G. D. (1979). Testing the practitioner’s impact on clients. Public Relations Review, 5(3), 47-59.
  • Broom, G. M. (1980). A Comparison of Roles Played by Men and Women in Public Relations.
  • Broom, G. M., and Dozier, D. M. (1986). Advancement For Public Relations Role Models. Public Relations Review, 12(1), 37-56
  • Chepchieng M.C. (2004). Influence of Institutional Characteristics on Student Attitudes Toward Campus Environment. A Comparative Study of Public and Private Universities in Kenya. Unpublished Ph.D Thesis, Egerton University, Njoro.
  • Christiansen, J. R. (2002). Student/Teacher Relationships and School Success: Perceptions ff Students From Grades Nine To Twelve. Doctoral Dissertation, Lethbridge, Alta: University ff Lethbridge, Faculty Of Education.
  • Fouts, G., and Poulsen, J. (2001). Attunement in the classroom: emotional connection may be the key to student stress. ATA Magazine, 81(3), 14-15.
  • Grunig, J. E., and Hunt, T. T. (1984). Managing Public Relations CL. California: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  • Hill, Y., Lomas, L., and MacGregor, J. (2003). Students’ Perceptions ff Quality In Higher Education. Quality Assurance In Education, 11(1), 15-20.
  • Işık, M. (2012). Halkla İlişkilere Giriş. M. Işık (Edt.). Halkla İlişkiler Uzmanı ve Nitelikleri (p. 22-28). Konya: Eğitim Yayınevi.
  • Karaca, M. (2017). Stratejik Girişimcilerin Kişilik Özelliklerini Belirlemeye Yönelik Bir Araştırma Neo FFI Kişilik Envanteri Uygulaması. Örgütsel Davranış Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(2), 1–19.
  • Ngara, E. (1995). The African University and Its Mission for Improving the Delivery of Education Institutions. Roma: Institute of Southern African Studies.
  • Niebuhr, K. and Neibuhr, R. (1999). An Empirical Study Of Student Relationships And Academic Achievement. Education, 119, (4), 679.
  • Piekos, J. M. and Einsiedel, E. F. (1989). Gender and Decision-making among Canadian Public Relations Practitoners, Paper Meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, (August, 10-13, 1989), 1-25.
  • Ronning W.M. (1997). College Quality Programmes: Implementation and Effects. J. of Quality in Higher Edu., 3(2), 113-129.
  • Soncu A. G. (2017). “İletişim Performansı Bağlamında Lider” Medya Çağında İletişim, Çizgi Kitabevi, Konya, 75-89.
  • Tiberius, R. (1999). The Why Of Teacher Student Relationships. TIP-IT Online Newsletter.
  • Toth, E. L.; Serini, S. A.; Wright, D.K. and Emig, A. G. (1998). Trends in Public Relations Roles: 1990-1995, Public Relations Review, 24(2), 145-163.
  • University of California Sample Teacher Interview Questions, http://eds-courses. ucsd.edu//tep129/InterviewQuestions.htm (Retrieved: 01.03.2018).
  • Whitt, E. J., Edison, M. I., Pascarella, E. T., Terenzini, P. T., and Nora, A. (2001). Influences On Students’ Openness to Diversity and Challenge In The Second And Third Years of College. The Journal of Higher Education, 72(2), 172-204.
  • Williams, D. (1986). Naturalistic evaluation. New directions for program evaluation: No. 30. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
There are 21 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Articles in Foreign Languages
Authors

Simge Ünlü Kurt 0000-0002-0137-4210

Publication Date July 30, 2018
Submission Date May 2, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2018 Volume: 5 Issue: 4

Cite

APA Kurt, S. Ü. (2018). Assessment of Student – Lecturer Relationship in Public Relations Postgraduate Education in Turkey. Erciyes İletişim Dergisi, 5(4), 465-477. https://doi.org/10.17680/erciyesiletisim.420523