Research Article
Year 2022,
Volume: 9 Issue: 2, 609 - 626, 22.07.2022
Abstract
The use of technology disrupts interpersonal communication and interaction and interferes with the communication process. One of the social areas where this is visible is communication between couples. For this reason, it is important to learn the positive or negative characteristics of the use of technological tools in the communication processes, relationship satisfaction and conflict situations of married couples with different age groups and different demographic characteristics, and the effects of technology use on their relationships. In this sense, to determine these effects, the research was carried out with the participation of 264 married people of different ages and demographic characteristics in the province of Istanbul. Technoference scale, relationship satisfaction scale, and romantic patrner conflict scale were used as data collection tools in the research. As a result of the analysis of the research data, it is observed that, in general, as people's use of technology and the effect of technoference in the relationship increase, there is a decrease in people's relationship satisfaction, and accordingly, indirect married couple conflicts in technology use also increase. In addition, married couples' use of technology, relationship satisfaction, and attitudes towards conflict differ according to gender, age, education, and income level.
References
- Akbağ, M., & Sayıner, B. (2021). Dijital Teknolojinin Yansımaları: Ebeveyn Teknoferansı ve Sosyoelitizmi. Humanistic Perspective, 3(3), 753-778.
- Bauer, N. (2018). Technoference Over Time and Parenting. Pediatric Research, 84(2), 157-158.
- Bradburry, T., Fincham, F., & Beach, S. (2000). Research on the Nature and Determinants of Marital Satisfaction: A Decade in Review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(4), 964-980.
- Burpee, L., & Langer, E. (2005). Mindfulness and Marital Satisfaction. Journal of Adult Development, 12(1), 43-51.
- Chesley, N. (2005). Blurring Boundaries? Linking Technology Use, Spillover, Individual Distress, and Family Satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(5), 1237-1248.
- Chesley, N. (2006). Families in a High-Tech Age. Journal of Family İssues, 27(5), 587-608.
- Coyne, S., Busby, D., Bushman, B., Gentile, D., Ridge, R., & Stockdale, L. (2012). Gaming in the Game of Love: Effects of Video Games on Conflict in Couples. Family Relations, 61(3), 388-396.
- Dew, J., & Tulane, S. (2015). The Association Between Time Spent Using Entertainment Media and Marital Quality in a Contemporary Dyadic National Sample. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 36(4), 621-632.
- Dudkina, A., & Maslinovska, L. (2017). Technoference, Couple's Relationship Satisfaction Correlation Between Conflict Management Strategies Choice. Society. Integration. Education. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, (pp. 501-512). Rezekne, Latvia.
- Duran, R., Kelly, L., & Rotaru, T. (2011). Mobile Phone in Romantic Relationships and the Dialectic of Autonomy Versus Connection. Communication Quarterly, 59(1), 19-36.
- Elias, N., Lemish, D., Dalyot, S., & Floegel, D. (2021). "Where Are You?" An Observational Exploration of Parental Technoference in Public Places in the US and Israel. Journal of Children and Media, 15(3), 376-388.
- Hertlein, K., & Chan, D. (2020). The Rationale Behind Texting, Videoconferencing, and Mobile Phones in Couple Relationships. Marriage & Family Review, 56(8), 739-763.
- Hipp, C., & Carlson, R. (2021). The Dyadic Association Among Technoference and Relationship and Sexual Satisfaction of Young Adult Couples. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 47(5), 508-520.
- Kraut, E., Kiesler, S., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet Paradox: A Social Technology That Reduces Social Involvement and Psychological Well-Being? The American Psycologist, 53(9), 1017-1031.
- Krogh, M., Egmose, I., Stuart, A., Madsen, E., Haase, T., & Vaever, M. (2021). A Longitudinal Examination of Daily Amounts of Screen Time and Technoference in Infants Aged 2-11 Months and Associations with Maternal Sociodemographic Factors. Infant Behavior and Development, 63, 1015-1043.
- Kross, E., Verduyn, P., Demiralp, E., Park, J., Lee, D., Lin, N., . . . Ybarra, O. (2013). Facebook Use Preditcs Declines in Subjuvtive Well-Being in Young Adults. Plos One, 8(8), 1-6.
- Leggett, C., & Rossouw, P. (2014). The Impact of Technology Use on Couple Relationships: A Neuropsycological Perspective. International Journal of Neuropsychotherapy, 2(1), 44-99.
- Lenhart, C., & Duggan, M. (2014). Couples the Internet, and Social Media. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/02/11/couples-the-internet-and-social-media/
- McDaniel, B., & Coyne, S. (2014). "Technoference": The Interference of Technology in Couple Relationships and Implications for Women's Personal and Relational Well-Being. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5(1), 85-98.
- McDaniel, B., & Drouin, M. (2019). Daily Technology Interruptions and Emotional and Relational Well-Being. Computers in Human Behavior, 99, 1-8.
- McDaniel, B., & Radesky, J. (2018a). Technoference: Parent Distraction with Technology and Associations with Child Behavior Problems. Child Development, 89(1), 100-109.
- McDaniel, B., Galovan, A., & Drouin, M. (2021). Daily Technoference, Technology Use During Couple Leisure Time, and Relationship Quality. Media Psychology, 24(5), 637-665.
- McDaniel, B., O'Connor, K., & Drouin, M. (2021). Work-Related Technoference at Home and Feelings of Work Spillover, Overload, Life Satisfaction and Job Satisfaction. International Journal of Workplace Health Management, 14(5), 526-541.
- McDaniels, B., & Radesky, J. (2018b). Technoference: Longitudinal Associations Between Parent Technology Use, Parenting Stress, and Child Behavoir Problems. Pediatric Research, 84(2), 210-218.
- Morgan, P., Hubler, D., Payne, P., Pomeroy, C., Gregg, D., & Homer, M. (2016). My Partner's Media Use: A Qualitative Study Exploring Perceptions of Problems with a Partner's Media Use. Marriage & Family Review, 53(7), 683-695.
- Nie, N., & Erbring, L. (2002). Internet and Society: A Preliminary Report. IT&Society, 1(1), 275-283.
- Qiao, L., & Liu, Q. (2020). The Effect of Technoference in Parent-Child Relationships on Adolescent Smartphone Addiction: The Role of Cognitive Factors. Children and Youth Services Review, 118, 1-9.
- Radesky, J., Kistin, C., Eisenberg, S., Gross, J., Block, G., Zuckerman, B., & Silverstein, M. (2016). Parent Perspectives on Their Mobile Technology Use: The Excitement and Exhaustion of Parenting While Connected. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 37(9), 694-701.
- Roberts, J., & David, M. (2016). My Life Has Become a Major Distraction From My Cell Phone: Partner Phubbing and Relationship Satisfaction Among Romantic Partners. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 134-141.
- Rusbult, C., Martz, J., & Agnew, C. (1998). The Invesment Model Scale: Measuring Commitment Level, Satisfaction Level, Quality of Alternatives, and Investment Size. Personal Relationships, 5(4), 357-387.
- Salmela, T., Colley, A., & Hakkila, J. (2019). Together Bed? Couples' Mobile Technology Use in Bed. In Proceedings of CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Glasgow, Scotland.
- Schiffrin, H., Edelman, A., Falkenstern, M., & Stewart, C. (2010). The Associations Among Computer-Mediated Communication, Relationships, and Well-Being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13(3), 299-306.
- Stockdale, L., Porter, C., Coyne, S., Essig, L., Booth, M., Keenan-Kroff, S., & Schvaneveldt, E. (2020). Infats' Response to a Mobile Phone Modified Still-Face Paradigm: Links to Maternal Behaviors and Beliefs Regarding Technoference. Infancy, 25(5), 571-592.
- Sundqvist, A., Heimann, M., & Koch, F. (2020). Relationship Between Family Technoference and Behavior Problems in Children Aged 4-5 Years. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 23(6), 371-376.
- Turkle, S. (2011). Alone Together. New York: Basic Books.
- Valkenburg, P., & Peter, J. (2007). Online Communication and Adolescent Well-Being: Testing the Stimulation Versus the Displacement Hypothesis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1169-1182.
- Vaterlaus, J., Stinson, R., & McEwen, M. (2020). Technology Use in Young Adult Marital Relationships: A Case Study Approach. Contemporary Family Therapy, 42, 394-407.
- Ward, P., Lundberg, N., Zabriskie, R., & Berrett, K. (2009). Measuring Marital Satisfaction: A Comparison of the Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale and the Satisfaction with Married Life Scale. Marriage & Family Review, 45(4), 412-429.
- Zacchilli, T., Hendrick, C., & Hendrick, S. (2009). The Romantic Partner Conflict Scale: A New Scale to Measure Relationship Conflict. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26(8), 1073-1096.
Year 2022,
Volume: 9 Issue: 2, 609 - 626, 22.07.2022
Abstract
Teknoloji kullanımı kişiler arası iletişim ve etkileşimi bozmakta ve iletişim sürecine müdahale etmektedir. Bunun görünür olduğu toplumsal alanlardan biri de çiftler arası iletişimdir. Bu nedenle teknolojik araçların kullanımının farklı yaş gruplarında ve farklı demografik özelliklere sahip evli çiftlerin, iletişim süreçlerinde, ilişki doyumunda ve çatışma durumlarında olumlu ya da olumsuz ne gibi özellikler gösterdiği ve kişilerin teknoloji kullanımının ilişkilerine olan etkilerini öğrenme noktasında önemli olmaktadır. Bu anlamda bu etkileri belirlemek amacıyla araştırma, İstanbul ilinde bulunan farklı yaş ve demografik özelliklere sahip 264 evli kişinin katılımıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmada veri toplama aracı olarak teknoferans ölçeği, ilişki doyum ölçeği ve romantik partner çatışma ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Araştırma verilerinin analizi sonucunda, genel olarak, kişilerin teknoloji kullanımı ve ilişkideki teknoferans etkisi arttıkça, kişilerin ilişki memnuniyetinde bir azalma olduğu ve buna bağlı olarak teknoloji kullanımı dolaylı evli çift çatışmalarının da arttığı gözlenmektedir. Ayrıca evli çiftlerin teknoloji kullanımı, ilişki memnuniyeti ve çatışmaya yönelik tutumları, cinsiyet, yaş, eğitim ve gelir düzeyine göre farklılık göstermektedir.
References
- Akbağ, M., & Sayıner, B. (2021). Dijital Teknolojinin Yansımaları: Ebeveyn Teknoferansı ve Sosyoelitizmi. Humanistic Perspective, 3(3), 753-778.
- Bauer, N. (2018). Technoference Over Time and Parenting. Pediatric Research, 84(2), 157-158.
- Bradburry, T., Fincham, F., & Beach, S. (2000). Research on the Nature and Determinants of Marital Satisfaction: A Decade in Review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(4), 964-980.
- Burpee, L., & Langer, E. (2005). Mindfulness and Marital Satisfaction. Journal of Adult Development, 12(1), 43-51.
- Chesley, N. (2005). Blurring Boundaries? Linking Technology Use, Spillover, Individual Distress, and Family Satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(5), 1237-1248.
- Chesley, N. (2006). Families in a High-Tech Age. Journal of Family İssues, 27(5), 587-608.
- Coyne, S., Busby, D., Bushman, B., Gentile, D., Ridge, R., & Stockdale, L. (2012). Gaming in the Game of Love: Effects of Video Games on Conflict in Couples. Family Relations, 61(3), 388-396.
- Dew, J., & Tulane, S. (2015). The Association Between Time Spent Using Entertainment Media and Marital Quality in a Contemporary Dyadic National Sample. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 36(4), 621-632.
- Dudkina, A., & Maslinovska, L. (2017). Technoference, Couple's Relationship Satisfaction Correlation Between Conflict Management Strategies Choice. Society. Integration. Education. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, (pp. 501-512). Rezekne, Latvia.
- Duran, R., Kelly, L., & Rotaru, T. (2011). Mobile Phone in Romantic Relationships and the Dialectic of Autonomy Versus Connection. Communication Quarterly, 59(1), 19-36.
- Elias, N., Lemish, D., Dalyot, S., & Floegel, D. (2021). "Where Are You?" An Observational Exploration of Parental Technoference in Public Places in the US and Israel. Journal of Children and Media, 15(3), 376-388.
- Hertlein, K., & Chan, D. (2020). The Rationale Behind Texting, Videoconferencing, and Mobile Phones in Couple Relationships. Marriage & Family Review, 56(8), 739-763.
- Hipp, C., & Carlson, R. (2021). The Dyadic Association Among Technoference and Relationship and Sexual Satisfaction of Young Adult Couples. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 47(5), 508-520.
- Kraut, E., Kiesler, S., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet Paradox: A Social Technology That Reduces Social Involvement and Psychological Well-Being? The American Psycologist, 53(9), 1017-1031.
- Krogh, M., Egmose, I., Stuart, A., Madsen, E., Haase, T., & Vaever, M. (2021). A Longitudinal Examination of Daily Amounts of Screen Time and Technoference in Infants Aged 2-11 Months and Associations with Maternal Sociodemographic Factors. Infant Behavior and Development, 63, 1015-1043.
- Kross, E., Verduyn, P., Demiralp, E., Park, J., Lee, D., Lin, N., . . . Ybarra, O. (2013). Facebook Use Preditcs Declines in Subjuvtive Well-Being in Young Adults. Plos One, 8(8), 1-6.
- Leggett, C., & Rossouw, P. (2014). The Impact of Technology Use on Couple Relationships: A Neuropsycological Perspective. International Journal of Neuropsychotherapy, 2(1), 44-99.
- Lenhart, C., & Duggan, M. (2014). Couples the Internet, and Social Media. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/02/11/couples-the-internet-and-social-media/
- McDaniel, B., & Coyne, S. (2014). "Technoference": The Interference of Technology in Couple Relationships and Implications for Women's Personal and Relational Well-Being. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5(1), 85-98.
- McDaniel, B., & Drouin, M. (2019). Daily Technology Interruptions and Emotional and Relational Well-Being. Computers in Human Behavior, 99, 1-8.
- McDaniel, B., & Radesky, J. (2018a). Technoference: Parent Distraction with Technology and Associations with Child Behavior Problems. Child Development, 89(1), 100-109.
- McDaniel, B., Galovan, A., & Drouin, M. (2021). Daily Technoference, Technology Use During Couple Leisure Time, and Relationship Quality. Media Psychology, 24(5), 637-665.
- McDaniel, B., O'Connor, K., & Drouin, M. (2021). Work-Related Technoference at Home and Feelings of Work Spillover, Overload, Life Satisfaction and Job Satisfaction. International Journal of Workplace Health Management, 14(5), 526-541.
- McDaniels, B., & Radesky, J. (2018b). Technoference: Longitudinal Associations Between Parent Technology Use, Parenting Stress, and Child Behavoir Problems. Pediatric Research, 84(2), 210-218.
- Morgan, P., Hubler, D., Payne, P., Pomeroy, C., Gregg, D., & Homer, M. (2016). My Partner's Media Use: A Qualitative Study Exploring Perceptions of Problems with a Partner's Media Use. Marriage & Family Review, 53(7), 683-695.
- Nie, N., & Erbring, L. (2002). Internet and Society: A Preliminary Report. IT&Society, 1(1), 275-283.
- Qiao, L., & Liu, Q. (2020). The Effect of Technoference in Parent-Child Relationships on Adolescent Smartphone Addiction: The Role of Cognitive Factors. Children and Youth Services Review, 118, 1-9.
- Radesky, J., Kistin, C., Eisenberg, S., Gross, J., Block, G., Zuckerman, B., & Silverstein, M. (2016). Parent Perspectives on Their Mobile Technology Use: The Excitement and Exhaustion of Parenting While Connected. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 37(9), 694-701.
- Roberts, J., & David, M. (2016). My Life Has Become a Major Distraction From My Cell Phone: Partner Phubbing and Relationship Satisfaction Among Romantic Partners. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 134-141.
- Rusbult, C., Martz, J., & Agnew, C. (1998). The Invesment Model Scale: Measuring Commitment Level, Satisfaction Level, Quality of Alternatives, and Investment Size. Personal Relationships, 5(4), 357-387.
- Salmela, T., Colley, A., & Hakkila, J. (2019). Together Bed? Couples' Mobile Technology Use in Bed. In Proceedings of CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Glasgow, Scotland.
- Schiffrin, H., Edelman, A., Falkenstern, M., & Stewart, C. (2010). The Associations Among Computer-Mediated Communication, Relationships, and Well-Being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13(3), 299-306.
- Stockdale, L., Porter, C., Coyne, S., Essig, L., Booth, M., Keenan-Kroff, S., & Schvaneveldt, E. (2020). Infats' Response to a Mobile Phone Modified Still-Face Paradigm: Links to Maternal Behaviors and Beliefs Regarding Technoference. Infancy, 25(5), 571-592.
- Sundqvist, A., Heimann, M., & Koch, F. (2020). Relationship Between Family Technoference and Behavior Problems in Children Aged 4-5 Years. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 23(6), 371-376.
- Turkle, S. (2011). Alone Together. New York: Basic Books.
- Valkenburg, P., & Peter, J. (2007). Online Communication and Adolescent Well-Being: Testing the Stimulation Versus the Displacement Hypothesis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1169-1182.
- Vaterlaus, J., Stinson, R., & McEwen, M. (2020). Technology Use in Young Adult Marital Relationships: A Case Study Approach. Contemporary Family Therapy, 42, 394-407.
- Ward, P., Lundberg, N., Zabriskie, R., & Berrett, K. (2009). Measuring Marital Satisfaction: A Comparison of the Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale and the Satisfaction with Married Life Scale. Marriage & Family Review, 45(4), 412-429.
- Zacchilli, T., Hendrick, C., & Hendrick, S. (2009). The Romantic Partner Conflict Scale: A New Scale to Measure Relationship Conflict. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26(8), 1073-1096.
There are 39 citations in total.
Details
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Communication and Media Studies |
| Journal Section | Articles in Foreign Languages |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | July 22, 2022 |
| Submission Date | March 21, 2022 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2022 Volume: 9 Issue: 2 |
Bu dergi Creative Commons Alıntı-GayriTicari-Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.